Assistive Robotics
LaboratoryClemson University

Assistive Robotics Laboratory · Research program

Control, design, and evaluation of assistive robots.

Our research addresses how robotic systems generate assistance, how that assistance can be customized, and how its effects on human movement are evaluated. Projects span lower-limb exoskeletons, length-actuated prostheses, and compliant robotic mechanisms.

Our approach

Task-agnostic control and user-specific assistance.

Conventional control methodologies for lower-limb exoskeletons often rely on pre-defined reference kinematics or task-specific torque profiles. These approaches can constrain voluntary motion and require parameter adjustment across users and locomotor tasks.

We investigate reference kinematics-free control strategies based on energy shaping, centroidal momentum regulation, and control barrier functions. Related research addresses length-actuated prostheses, continuum robotic systems, and passivity-based bipedal locomotion. Mathematical analysis, simulation, and human-subject experiments are used to characterize controller performance and human–robot interaction.

Control and Customization

Develop task-agnostic control strategies and customize robotic assistance through human-in-the-loop optimization.

Design

Develop and prototype user-friendly wearable devices and compliant mechanisms for physical interaction with human users.

Evaluations

Conduct biomechanics studies to characterize human movement and evaluate assistance through muscle activity, joint mechanics, and stability-related outcomes.

01 / Control and Customization

Task-Agnostic Control and Customization

Control formulations and optimization frameworks for assistance that accommodates user-selected movement.

Control formulation · Energy and momentum

Task-agnostic assistance through energy and momentum shaping

Task-specific reference trajectories can restrict the adaptability of lower-limb exoskeletons to continuously varying human activities. We investigate control paradigms that regulate human body energetics and centroidal momentum without prescribing reference joint kinematics.

SportsMate 5 hip exoskeleton and participant wearing hip actuators, IMUs, and a Raspberry Pi
SportsMate 5 hip exoskeleton and experimental instrumentation. Figure 1 from Yu, Dean & Lv, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2026.

Control objective

Kinematic control approaches depend on pre-defined reference trajectories that can be difficult to adjust across locomotor tasks and human subjects. For individuals with partial or full voluntary control of their lower limbs, such references may overly constrain self-selected motion.

Energy and momentum formulations

Energy shaping modifies the closed-loop mechanical energy of the coupled human–exoskeleton system. Potential energy shaping can provide body-weight support, whereas kinetic energy shaping modifies effective mass and inertia. Highly backdrivable actuation facilitates voluntary movement while enabling the commanded assistive torques.

Our centroidal momentum shaping paradigm regulates the sum of limb momenta projected onto the human center of mass. A virtual reference model is constructed from each user’s real-time gait with scaled limb inertial parameters. A nonlinear disturbance observer estimates voluntary human joint torques, and these estimates are incorporated into the control design.

Hip-exoskeleton validation

Our 2026 IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters study reports preliminary experiments with six non-disabled participants wearing a bilateral hip exoskeleton during treadmill walking, ground–stair transitions, and sit-to-stand tasks. Ensemble-averaged muscle efforts decreased by 22% with assistance. These findings are specific to the preliminary study conditions.

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2026

Task-Agnostic Assistance via Centroidal Momentum Shaping

Preliminary validation of centroidal momentum shaping on a hip exoskeleton.

Watch on YouTube ↗

IEEE ICRA · 2025

Centroidal momentum shaping on a bilateral hip exoskeleton

Conference video presenting preliminary validation of task-agnostic assistance on a bilateral hip exoskeleton.

Watch on YouTube ↗

Control customization · Human-in-the-loop optimization

Human-in-the-loop customization of assistance

The relationship between control parameters and human effort varies across individuals and locomotor activities. We combine task-agnostic assistive strategies with sample-efficient optimization to customize lower-limb exoskeleton assistance.

Customization objective

Although energy-shaping strategies can provide task-agnostic assistance, their parameters influence the resulting human joint torques and energetic demands. A systematic customization framework is needed to identify appropriate parameters across users and tasks.

Optimization framework

We investigate derivative-free, sample-efficient optimization in conjunction with energy-shaping control. The framework searches for assistive parameters using human performance-based objectives while retaining a task-agnostic controller structure.

The customization loop

  1. Set the assistance. Choose parameters within an energy-shaping strategy.
  2. Evaluate the response. Assess the resulting movement and effort objective.
  3. Update the parameters. Use optimization to search for improved assistance.

Simulation and computational studies

Simulation studies of the learning framework demonstrate reductions in modeled human joint torque and metabolic cost. Related work investigates a two-layer human-in-the-loop optimization structure and physics-informed neural networks for solving the energy-shaping matching condition. Simulation findings are distinguished from experimental validation.

Stability augmentation · Perturbed locomotion

Human-centered stability augmentation control

The vast majority of lower-limb exoskeleton controllers are developed and validated under steady-state locomotor conditions. We investigate proactive stability augmentation under leaning and slip perturbations while preserving voluntary human motion.

Stability objective

Control paradigms validated under nominal walking may not generalize to unstable conditions or external perturbations. In addition, task-specific recovery trajectories can constrain the user’s voluntary responses.

Control Barrier Function formulation

The proposed paradigm defines a center of mass-based stability indicator and enforces its dynamics within a user-specific safe range through control barrier functions. Corrective assistance is generated as the system state approaches the safety-set boundary. A nonlinear disturbance observer estimates a lumped input comprising voluntary human joint torque and external perturbations; this estimate is incorporated into the control design.

The research question

Proactive stability assistance without pre-defined reference kinematics.

The controller accounts for user-specific stability constraints, voluntary joint torques, and external perturbations within a common control formulation.

Leaning and slip experiments

The final Humanoids 2026 manuscript reports preliminary experiments with two non-disabled participants wearing a bilateral hip exoskeleton. Ensemble-averaged muscle efforts decreased by 41% during leaning and 12% during slip perturbations, with lower peak-to-peak whole-body angular momentum and faster recovery. These preliminary results do not establish efficacy outside the tested participants and conditions.

IEEE-RAS Humanoids · 2026

Human-centered stability augmentation under leaning and slip perturbations

Preliminary experimental validation of a control barrier function-based stability augmentation paradigm on a bilateral hip exoskeleton.

Watch on YouTube ↗Conference paper (PDF) →

IEEE Control Systems Letters · Simulation

Safety augmentation for volitional human locomotion

Simulation accompanying the balance-control case study by Miao Yu, Qin Lin, and Ge Lv.

Watch on YouTube ↗

02 / Design

Wearable Device Development and Prototyping

Device architectures, compliant mechanisms, and prototypes evaluated in the laboratory’s research.

Device development · Prosthetic systems

Length-actuated transfemoral prostheses

We investigate dynamic leg-length actuation as an alternative prosthetic design methodology. The objective is to coordinate stance support and swing-phase clearance through active shortening and lengthening of a transfemoral prosthesis.

Design requirements

Transfemoral prosthesis users may experience challenges in stance stability, push-off, and swing-phase toe clearance. These requirements motivate prosthetic mechanisms that actively modify leg length during ambulation.

Length-actuation mechanism

The proposed device employs a prismatic mechanism to modify leg length during the gait cycle. Dynamic leg-length modeling informs the desired actuation profile, and experimental evaluation incorporates user preferences and gait biomechanics.

Gait evaluation

Experiments with participants with amputation investigate gait symmetry, stability, and mobility with the length-actuated device. The design and preliminary evaluation are reported in IEEE Access (2024), with a subsequent case study in Prosthetics and Orthotics International (2026).

A participant wearing the length-actuated transfemoral prosthesisMechanical design of the length-actuated prosthesis
The length-actuated prosthesis and its mechanical design. Participant evaluation connects hardware development to gait biomechanics.

Related ARL publications

Topic bibliography →

IEEE Access · Design and preliminary evaluation

Transfemoral prosthesis with ambulatory length-actuation

Research video accompanying the length-actuated prosthesis study by Parr, DesJardins, Hippensteal, Harvey, and Lv.

Watch on YouTube ↗

Compliant mechanisms · Continuum robotics

Compliant robots for physical interaction

We investigate continuum and hybrid rigid–compliant robotic systems for physical interaction with human users and unstructured environments. Structural compliance provides a means of accommodating contact and geometric variation during assistance and manipulation.

Wearable assistance and fall mitigation

Continuum robots achieve distributed bending through compliant structures. We investigate their use as auxiliary limbs and wearable appendages for daily assistance, including the preliminary design and evaluation of a continuum robot-based fall-mitigation system.

Related work explores a continuum-legged biped with a kangaroo-inspired tail for tripedal locomotion, extending compliant mechanisms to new robot architectures.

Hybrid rigid–continuum grasping

In collaboration with Prof. Ian Walker’s group, we investigate an avian-inspired gripper that integrates actuated rigid structures with compliant continuum digits. The hybrid architecture combines load-bearing capability with adaptability during grasping. Related work develops a teleoperation framework for the compliant gripper.

Related ARL publications

Topic bibliography →

IEEE CASE · 2025

Teleoperation of a compliant avian-inspired robot gripper

Demonstration of teleoperation of a compliant gripper with continuum digits.

Watch on YouTube ↗
The Claw hybrid rigid-continuum gripperWatch supplementary video on MDPI ↗

Robotics · 2024 · Supplementary Video S1

The Claw: An Avian-Inspired, Large Scale, Hybrid Rigid-Continuum Gripper

Supplementary video accompanying the Robotics paper, showing experiments with the avian-inspired hybrid rigid-continuum gripper.

Supplementary Video S1 on MDPI ↗

Control foundations

Robust bipedal locomotion

Passivity-based control provides a foundation for reasoning about energy, stability, and interaction in legged systems.

Our bipedal locomotion work introduces a generalized energy storage function that accounts for energy stored and dissipated by an inner-loop controller. An outer-loop passivity-based controller is designed to enlarge the basin of attraction, improve robustness to ground slope, and accelerate convergence to a stable walking cycle.

Decentralized Passivity-Based Control with a Generalized Energy Storage Function for Robust Biped Locomotion
Yeatman, Lv & Gregg · ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control · 2019

Explore the foundational work →

Research support

Funding

Awarded research support includes National Science Foundation projects and a faculty development award through the NIH-supported SC-TRIMH program.

National Science Foundation

A Task-Invariant Customization Framework for Lower-Limb Exoskeletons to Assist Volitional Human Motion

Foundational Research in Robotics · CAREER

Role
Ge Lv · Principal investigator
Period
2024–2029
Awarded amount
$570,938
Award number
2340261

This project investigates task-agnostic assistive strategies and a human-in-the-loop framework for rapidly customizing lower-limb exoskeleton assistance across users and locomotor tasks.

NSF award record →

National Science Foundation

Robot-Rooms: Giving Form to Domestic Activity, On the Go

Human-Centered Computing · Collaborative Research: HCC: Small

Role
Ge Lv · Transferred subaward
Period
2024–2026
Awarded amount
$50,000

Collaborative research on robotic systems for domestic activity. The subaward was transferred from the previous principal investigator, Ian Walker, University of Wyoming.

National Institutes of Health · SC-TRIMH

Faculty Development Award: South Carolina Translational Research Improving Musculoskeletal Health

Phase I · Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE)

Role
Ge Lv · Principal investigator
Period
2021–2023
Awarded amount
$20,000

Faculty development support through SC-TRIMH under Phase I of the NIH Center of Biomedical Research Excellence program.

Clemson faculty profile →

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in NSF-supported work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Explore further

Research collaboration and training

Our research integrates control theory, robotic hardware development, and experimental evaluation. Related publications and research personnel are available below.